Australia vs New Zealand: Adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum
Australia
0.7904
in 2018
New Zealand
0.8236
in 2018
Australia rank
25th
New Zealand rank
24th
Adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum over time
- Australia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.8236 against 0.7904 in Australia, a difference of 0.0332.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 25th and New Zealand ranks 24th of 42 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.933 | 0.9639 | 0.031 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.8387 | 0.8525 | 0.0138 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum, Australia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 0.8236 against 0.7904 in Australia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum between Australia and New Zealand?
- 0.0332, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Australia and New Zealand rank globally for adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum?
- Australia ranks 25th and New Zealand ranks 24th of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum proficiency level in reading and mathematics (ratio). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.