Latvia vs Luxembourg: Adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum
Latvia
0.8347 ratio
in 2018
Luxembourg
0.8637 ratio
in 2012
Latvia rank
20th
Luxembourg rank
19th
Adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum over time
- Latvia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.8637 ratio against 0.8347 ratio in Latvia, a difference of 0.029 ratio.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Latvia ranks 20th and Luxembourg ranks 19th of 42 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8614 ratio | 0.9357 ratio | 0.0743 ratio | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.8791 ratio | 0.8637 ratio | 0.0154 ratio | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum, Latvia or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 0.8637 ratio against 0.8347 ratio in Latvia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum between Latvia and Luxembourg?
- 0.029 ratio, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Luxembourg?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2012.
- How do Latvia and Luxembourg rank globally for adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum?
- Latvia ranks 20th and Luxembourg ranks 19th of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum proficiency level in reading and mathematics (ratio). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.