Latvia vs New Zealand: Adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum
Latvia
0.8347
in 2018
New Zealand
0.8236
in 2018
Latvia rank
20th
New Zealand rank
24th
Adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum over time
- Latvia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.8347 against 0.8236 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0111.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.
Latvia ranks 20th and New Zealand ranks 24th of 42 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8614 | 0.9639 | 0.1025 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.8569 | 0.8525 | 0.0044 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum, Latvia or New Zealand?
- Latvia, at 0.8347 against 0.8236 in New Zealand as of 2018.
- What is the difference in adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum between Latvia and New Zealand?
- 0.0111, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and New Zealand rank globally for adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum?
- Latvia ranks 20th and New Zealand ranks 24th of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Adjusted rural to urban parity index for achieving a minimum proficiency level in reading and mathematics (ratio). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.