Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Dollar value of all resources made available to strengthen

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
181.45 million
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
34.23 million
in 2023
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
4th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
2nd

Dollar value of all resources made available to strengthen over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M201020162023

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 181.45 million against 34.23 million in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 147.22 million.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 5.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 31 groups.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 121.98 million 21.03 million 100.96 million Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 171.52 million 24.42 million 147.10 million Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dollar value of all resources made available to strengthen, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 181.45 million against 34.23 million in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in dollar value of all resources made available to strengthen between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
147.22 million, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for dollar value of all resources made available to strengthen?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Dollar value of all resources made available to strengthen statistical capacity in developing countries (current United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Dollar value of all resources made available to strengthen. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 15 October 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/dollar-value-of-all-resources-made-available-to-strengthen-statistical-capacity-in/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/dollar-value-of-all-resources-made-available-to-strengthen-statistical-capacity-in/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Dollar value of all resources made available to strengthen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dollar value of all resources made available to strengthen statistical capacity in developing countries (current United States dollars)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
186 places, 2,527 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed