Bolivia vs Papua New Guinea: PM2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO
PM2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO over time
- Bolivia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Bolivia ranks 124th and Papua New Guinea ranks 126th of 194 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pm2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who, Bolivia or Papua New Guinea?
- Bolivia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Papua New Guinea as of 2017.
- What is the difference in pm2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who between Bolivia and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.0%, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Papua New Guinea?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2017.
- How do Bolivia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for pm2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who?
- Bolivia ranks 124th and Papua New Guinea ranks 126th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as PM2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO guideline value (% of total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percent of population exposed to ambient concentrations of PM2.5 that exceed the WHO guideline value is defined as the portion of a country’s population living in places where mean annual concentrations of PM2.5 are greater than 10 micrograms per cubic meter, the guideline value recommended by the World Health Organization as the lower end of the range of concentrations over which adverse health effects due to PM2.5 exposure have been observed.