Brunei Darussalam vs Estonia: PM2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO
PM2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Estonia
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Estonia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Estonia ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 189th and Estonia ranks 189th of 194 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 16.5% | 16.5% | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0.9% | 5.4% | 4.5% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 1.8% | 1.1% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pm2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who, Brunei Darussalam or Estonia?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Estonia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in pm2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who between Brunei Darussalam and Estonia?
- 0.0%, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Estonia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2017.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Estonia rank globally for pm2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 189th and Estonia ranks 189th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as PM2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO guideline value (% of total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percent of population exposed to ambient concentrations of PM2.5 that exceed the WHO guideline value is defined as the portion of a country’s population living in places where mean annual concentrations of PM2.5 are greater than 10 micrograms per cubic meter, the guideline value recommended by the World Health Organization as the lower end of the range of concentrations over which adverse health effects due to PM2.5 exposure have been observed.