Equatorial Guinea vs Samoa: PM2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO
Equatorial Guinea
100.0%
in 2017
Samoa
100.0%
in 2017
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
Samoa rank
1st
PM2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Samoa
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Samoa, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and Samoa ranks 1st of 194 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pm2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who, Equatorial Guinea or Samoa?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Samoa as of 2017.
- What is the difference in pm2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who between Equatorial Guinea and Samoa?
- 0.0%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Samoa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2017.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Samoa rank globally for pm2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and Samoa ranks 1st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as PM2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO guideline value (% of total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percent of population exposed to ambient concentrations of PM2.5 that exceed the WHO guideline value is defined as the portion of a country’s population living in places where mean annual concentrations of PM2.5 are greater than 10 micrograms per cubic meter, the guideline value recommended by the World Health Organization as the lower end of the range of concentrations over which adverse health effects due to PM2.5 exposure have been observed.