Eritrea vs Saint Lucia: PM2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO
Eritrea
100.0%
in 2017
Saint Lucia
100.0%
in 2017
Eritrea rank
1st
Saint Lucia rank
1st
PM2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO over time
- Eritrea
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 1st and Saint Lucia ranks 1st of 194 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pm2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who, Eritrea or Saint Lucia?
- Eritrea, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Saint Lucia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in pm2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who between Eritrea and Saint Lucia?
- 0.0%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Saint Lucia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2017.
- How do Eritrea and Saint Lucia rank globally for pm2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who?
- Eritrea ranks 1st and Saint Lucia ranks 1st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as PM2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO guideline value (% of total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percent of population exposed to ambient concentrations of PM2.5 that exceed the WHO guideline value is defined as the portion of a country’s population living in places where mean annual concentrations of PM2.5 are greater than 10 micrograms per cubic meter, the guideline value recommended by the World Health Organization as the lower end of the range of concentrations over which adverse health effects due to PM2.5 exposure have been observed.