Angola vs Saudi Arabia: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per square

Angola
7.45 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
8.19 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
92nd
Saudi Arabia rank
90th

Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per square over time

  • Angola
  • Saudi Arabia
02468196119922023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 8.19 units per square kilometre against 7.45 units per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.74 units per square kilometre.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 92nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 90th of 121 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2576 units per square kilometre 0.3621 units per square kilometre 0.1045 units per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1970s 0.4726 units per square kilometre 0.9053 units per square kilometre 0.4327 units per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1980s 0.8253 units per square kilometre 1.88 units per square kilometre 1.06 units per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1990s 1.63 units per square kilometre 3.39 units per square kilometre 1.76 units per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2000s 3.06 units per square kilometre 4.71 units per square kilometre 1.65 units per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2010s 5.44 units per square kilometre 6.62 units per square kilometre 1.19 units per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2020s 7.06 units per square kilometre 7.96 units per square kilometre 0.9023 units per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per square, Angola or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 8.19 units per square kilometre against 7.45 units per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per square between Angola and Saudi Arabia?
0.74 units per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Saudi Arabia rank globally for population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per square?
Angola ranks 92nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 90th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Saudi Arabia: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/population-in-urban-agglomerations-of-more-than-1-million-per-square-kilometre/angola/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/population-in-urban-agglomerations-of-more-than-1-million-per-square-kilometre/angola/saudi-arabia/">Angola vs Saudi Arabia: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
121 places, 7,176 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.