Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per unit in Argentina
Argentina: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per unit was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per unit in Argentina, 1960–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per unit in Argentina is 0 units per US$ of GDP, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 5.7% on the previous year and down 5.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per unit in Argentina peaked at 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP in 1960 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2017.
That places Argentina 64th out of 120 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per unit in Argentina, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | -19.3% |
| 1962 | 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP | +12.3% |
| 1963 | 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP | +2.7% |
| 1964 | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | -27.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 1966 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | +1.3% |
| 1967 | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | +20.8% |
| 1968 | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 1969 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 1970 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | +1.2% |
| 1971 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 1972 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 1973 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -32.8% |
| 1974 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -26.2% |
| 1975 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | +40.5% |
| 1976 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | +4.2% |
| 1977 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -8.3% |
| 1978 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -35.1% |
| 1979 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | +30.8% |
| 1980 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 1981 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 1982 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -17.9% |
| 1984 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
| 1985 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | +34.3% |
| 1986 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -15.7% |
| 1987 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 1988 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -13.2% |
| 1989 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | +67.7% |
| 1990 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -45.1% |
| 1991 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -24.6% |
| 1992 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -16.2% |
| 1993 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 1994 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1995 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +0.9% |
| 1996 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 1997 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 1998 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +6.6% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +0.9% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +6.9% |
| 2002 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | +178.3% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -22.4% |
| 2004 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -21.5% |
| 2005 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -16.1% |
| 2006 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -13.4% |
| 2007 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -18.0% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -19.4% |
| 2009 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +10.0% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -20.4% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -19.4% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.4% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +5.7% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.5% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.7% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +23.5% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +18.1% |
| 2020 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +17.0% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -20.1% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -22.6% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.6% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Argentina
More urban development data for Argentina
- Population in the largest city 37.2% (2025)
- Population density 16.64 people per sq. km of land area (2023)
- PM2.5 air pollution, mean annual exposure 14.35 micrograms per cubic meter (2023)
- Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million 20.28 million (2025)
- Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per capita 0.4423 units per person (2025)
- Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, annual 0.903 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per square 7.28 units per square kilometre (2023)
- Population in largest city 15.75 million (2025)
- Crude steelmaking capacity 7.33 Tonnes (2025)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological 549.25 Hectares (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per unit in Argentina?
- Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per unit in Argentina was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per unit recorded in Argentina?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP in 1960.
- What is the lowest population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per unit recorded in Argentina?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2017.
- How does Argentina rank for population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per unit?
- Argentina ranks 64th out of 120 countries with data for 2025.
- Is population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per unit rising or falling in Argentina?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Argentina data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 66 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million World Urbanization Prospects 2018, United Nations (UN)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.