Africa, fragile states vs Germany: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Africa, fragile states
1,961 Hectares
in 2020
Germany
1,834 Hectares
in 2020
Africa, fragile states rank
18th
Germany rank
8th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Africa, fragile states
  • Germany
05001.0k1.5k2.0k200020102020

How they compare

Africa, fragile states currently reports 1,961 Hectares against 1,834 Hectares in Germany, a difference of 127 Hectares.

That makes Africa, fragile states's figure about 1.1 times Germany's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Germany ahead.

Africa, fragile states ranks 18th and Germany ranks 8th of 47 regions.

Across the 3 decades both report, Africa, fragile states averaged higher in 1 and Germany in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa, fragile states Germany Difference Ahead
2000s 959.87 Hectares 1,660 Hectares 699.69 Hectares Germany
2010s 1,464 Hectares 1,828 Hectares 363.31 Hectares Germany
2020s 1,961 Hectares 1,834 Hectares 126.55 Hectares Africa, fragile states

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Africa, fragile states or Germany?
Africa, fragile states, at 1,961 Hectares against 1,834 Hectares in Germany as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Africa, fragile states and Germany?
127 Hectares, with Africa, fragile states ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa, fragile states and Germany?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Africa, fragile states and Germany rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Africa, fragile states ranks 18th and Germany ranks 8th of 47 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa, fragile states vs Germany: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/africa-fragile-states/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/africa-fragile-states/germany/">Africa, fragile states vs Germany: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.