Antigua and Barbuda vs Solomon Islands: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Antigua and Barbuda
1.06 Hectares
in 2020
Solomon Islands
0.9242 Hectares
in 2020
Antigua and Barbuda rank
148th
Solomon Islands rank
150th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Solomon Islands
00.250.50.751200020102020

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 1.06 Hectares against 0.9242 Hectares in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.1358 Hectares.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 148th and Solomon Islands ranks 150th of 170 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 0.7336 Hectares 0.8074 Hectares 0.0739 Hectares Solomon Islands
2010s 0.9917 Hectares 0.8806 Hectares 0.111 Hectares Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 1.06 Hectares 0.9242 Hectares 0.1337 Hectares Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Antigua and Barbuda or Solomon Islands?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 1.06 Hectares against 0.9242 Hectares in Solomon Islands as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Antigua and Barbuda and Solomon Islands?
0.1358 Hectares, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Solomon Islands?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Solomon Islands rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 148th and Solomon Islands ranks 150th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Solomon Islands: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/antigua-and-barbuda/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/antigua-and-barbuda/solomon-islands/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Solomon Islands: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.