Armenia vs Botswana: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Armenia
52.93 Hectares
in 2020
Botswana
53.31 Hectares
in 2020
Armenia rank
89th
Botswana rank
88th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Armenia
  • Botswana
20304050200020102020

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 53.31 Hectares against 52.93 Hectares in Armenia, a difference of 0.38 Hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 89th and Botswana ranks 88th of 175 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Botswana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Botswana Difference Ahead
2000s 37.49 Hectares 19.6 Hectares 17.89 Hectares Armenia
2010s 48.3 Hectares 33.71 Hectares 14.59 Hectares Armenia
2020s 52.93 Hectares 53.31 Hectares 0.3778 Hectares Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Armenia or Botswana?
Botswana, at 53.31 Hectares against 52.93 Hectares in Armenia as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Armenia and Botswana?
0.38 Hectares, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Botswana?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Armenia and Botswana rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Armenia ranks 89th and Botswana ranks 88th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability β€” Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Botswana: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/armenia/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/armenia/botswana/">Armenia vs Botswana: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability β€” Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.