Australia vs Eswatini: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Australia
931 Hectares
in 2020
Eswatini
3.84 Hectares
in 2020
Australia rank
16th
Eswatini rank
26th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Australia
  • Eswatini
02004006008001.0k200020102020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 931 Hectares against 3.84 Hectares in Eswatini, a difference of 927.16 Hectares.

That makes Australia's figure about 242.7 times Eswatini's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 16th and Eswatini ranks 26th of 170 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Eswatini Difference Ahead
2000s 791.49 Hectares 2.26 Hectares 789.22 Hectares Australia
2010s 892.18 Hectares 3.15 Hectares 889.03 Hectares Australia
2020s 931 Hectares 3.84 Hectares 927.16 Hectares Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Australia or Eswatini?
Australia, at 931 Hectares against 3.84 Hectares in Eswatini as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Australia and Eswatini?
927.16 Hectares, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Eswatini?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Australia and Eswatini rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Australia ranks 16th and Eswatini ranks 26th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Eswatini: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/australia/eswatini-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/australia/eswatini-2/">Australia vs Eswatini: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.