Belarus vs Côte d’Ivoire: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Belarus
144.92 Hectares
in 2020
Côte d’Ivoire
146.24 Hectares
in 2020
Belarus rank
52nd
Côte d’Ivoire rank
51st

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Belarus
  • Côte d’Ivoire
050100150200020102020

How they compare

Côte d’Ivoire currently reports 146.24 Hectares against 144.92 Hectares in Belarus, a difference of 1.32 Hectares.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Côte d’Ivoire ahead.

Belarus ranks 52nd and Côte d’Ivoire ranks 51st of 170 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Côte d’Ivoire in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Côte d’Ivoire Difference Ahead
2000s 111.22 Hectares 86.82 Hectares 24.4 Hectares Belarus
2010s 138.29 Hectares 118.99 Hectares 19.3 Hectares Belarus
2020s 144.92 Hectares 146.24 Hectares 1.32 Hectares Côte d’Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Belarus or Côte d’Ivoire?
Côte d’Ivoire, at 146.24 Hectares against 144.92 Hectares in Belarus as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Belarus and Côte d’Ivoire?
1.32 Hectares, with Côte d’Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Côte d’Ivoire?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Côte d’Ivoire rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Belarus ranks 52nd and Côte d’Ivoire ranks 51st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Côte d’Ivoire: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/belarus/cote-d-ivoire-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/belarus/cote-d-ivoire-2/">Belarus vs Côte d’Ivoire: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.