Belgium vs East African Community: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Belgium
261.1 Hectares
in 2020
East African Community
437.12 Hectares
in 2020
Belgium rank
31st
East African Community rank
32nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Belgium
  • East African Community
100200300400200020102020

How they compare

East African Community currently reports 437.12 Hectares against 261.1 Hectares in Belgium, a difference of 176.02 Hectares.

That makes East African Community's figure about 1.7 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 31st and East African Community ranks 32nd of 170 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and East African Community in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium East African Community Difference Ahead
2000s 232.36 Hectares 199.79 Hectares 32.58 Hectares Belgium
2010s 259.07 Hectares 324.63 Hectares 65.55 Hectares East African Community
2020s 261.1 Hectares 437.12 Hectares 176.02 Hectares East African Community

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Belgium or East African Community?
East African Community, at 437.12 Hectares against 261.1 Hectares in Belgium as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Belgium and East African Community?
176.02 Hectares, with East African Community ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and East African Community?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Belgium and East African Community rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Belgium ranks 31st and East African Community ranks 32nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs East African Community: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/belgium/east-african-community/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/belgium/east-african-community/">Belgium vs East African Community: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.