Bhutan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Bhutan
0.2848 Hectares
in 2020
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.558 Hectares
in 2020
Bhutan rank
158th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
156th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Bhutan
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.20.40.6200020102020

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.558 Hectares against 0.2848 Hectares in Bhutan, a difference of 0.2732 Hectares.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 2.0 times Bhutan's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 158th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 156th of 170 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0686 Hectares 0.3296 Hectares 0.261 Hectares Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.1912 Hectares 0.497 Hectares 0.3057 Hectares Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.2848 Hectares 0.558 Hectares 0.2732 Hectares Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Bhutan or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.558 Hectares against 0.2848 Hectares in Bhutan as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Bhutan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.2732 Hectares, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Bhutan and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Bhutan ranks 158th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 156th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/bhutan/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/bhutan/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Bhutan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.