Botswana vs Uganda: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Botswana
53.31 Hectares
in 2020
Uganda
54.77 Hectares
in 2020
Botswana rank
88th
Uganda rank
87th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Botswana
  • Uganda
20304050200020102020

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 54.77 Hectares against 53.31 Hectares in Botswana, a difference of 1.46 Hectares.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uganda ahead.

Botswana ranks 88th and Uganda ranks 87th of 175 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 19.6 Hectares 28.99 Hectares 9.39 Hectares Uganda
2010s 33.71 Hectares 42.72 Hectares 9.02 Hectares Uganda
2020s 53.31 Hectares 54.77 Hectares 1.46 Hectares Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Botswana or Uganda?
Uganda, at 54.77 Hectares against 53.31 Hectares in Botswana as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Botswana and Uganda?
1.46 Hectares, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Uganda?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Botswana and Uganda rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Botswana ranks 88th and Uganda ranks 87th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability β€” Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Uganda: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/botswana/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/botswana/uganda/">Botswana vs Uganda: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability β€” Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.