How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Nepal?

21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.

Where does this data come from?

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Nepal: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Chad

26.34 Hectares

in 2020

Nepal

27.33 Hectares

in 2020

Chad rank

117th

Nepal rank

116th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

Chad
Nepal

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 27.33 Hectares against 26.34 Hectares in Chad, a difference of 0.99 Hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 117th and Nepal ranks 116th of 175 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
2000s	17.09 Hectares	15.98 Hectares	1.11 Hectares	Chad
2010s	20.63 Hectares	24.44 Hectares	3.81 Hectares	Nepal
2020s	26.34 Hectares	27.33 Hectares	0.994 Hectares	Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Chad or Nepal?: Nepal, at 27.33 Hectares against 26.34 Hectares in Chad as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Chad and Nepal?: 0.99 Hectares, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Nepal?: 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Chad and Nepal rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?: Chad ranks 117th and Nepal ranks 116th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Nepal: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/chad/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/chad/nepal/">Chad vs Nepal: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit: Hectares
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence: OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. <br><br> Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.