Chile vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Chile
217.31 Hectares
in 2020
Democratic Republic of the Congo
199.75 Hectares
in 2020
Chile rank
38th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
38th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Chile
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
050100150200200020102020

How they compare

Chile currently reports 217.31 Hectares against 199.75 Hectares in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 17.56 Hectares.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 38th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 38th of 170 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 134.19 Hectares 102.67 Hectares 31.52 Hectares Chile
2010s 178.72 Hectares 153.29 Hectares 25.42 Hectares Chile
2020s 217.31 Hectares 199.75 Hectares 17.56 Hectares Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Chile or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Chile, at 217.31 Hectares against 199.75 Hectares in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Chile and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
17.56 Hectares, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Chile and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Chile ranks 38th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 38th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/chile/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/chile/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Chile vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.