How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nepal?

21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.

Where does this data come from?

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Nepal: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Congo

27.52 Hectares

in 2020

Nepal

27.33 Hectares

in 2020

Congo rank

110th

Nepal rank

111th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

Congo
Nepal

How they compare

Congo currently reports 27.52 Hectares against 27.33 Hectares in Nepal, a difference of 0.19 Hectares.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 110th and Nepal ranks 111th of 170 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
2000s	15.11 Hectares	15.98 Hectares	0.8684 Hectares	Nepal
2010s	21.92 Hectares	24.44 Hectares	2.52 Hectares	Nepal
2020s	27.52 Hectares	27.33 Hectares	0.186 Hectares	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Congo or Nepal?: Congo, at 27.52 Hectares against 27.33 Hectares in Nepal as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Congo and Nepal?: 0.19 Hectares, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nepal?: 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Congo and Nepal rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?: Congo ranks 110th and Nepal ranks 111th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Nepal: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/congo-rep/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/congo-rep/nepal/">Congo vs Nepal: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit: Hectares
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence: OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.