Croatia vs Resource-rich countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Croatia
71.25 Hectares
in 2020
Resource-rich countries
6,020 Hectares
in 2020
Croatia rank
21st
Resource-rich countries rank
3rd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Croatia
  • Resource-rich countries
02.0k4.0k6.0k200020102020

How they compare

Resource-rich countries currently reports 6,020 Hectares against 71.25 Hectares in Croatia, a difference of 5,949 Hectares.

That makes Resource-rich countries's figure about 84.5 times Croatia's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Resource-rich countries has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 21st and Resource-rich countries ranks 3rd of 28 groups.

Resource-rich countries has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Resource-rich countries Difference Ahead
2000s 53.31 Hectares 3,988 Hectares 3,935 Hectares Resource-rich countries
2010s 66.71 Hectares 5,248 Hectares 5,182 Hectares Resource-rich countries
2020s 71.25 Hectares 6,020 Hectares 5,949 Hectares Resource-rich countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Croatia or Resource-rich countries?
Resource-rich countries, at 6,020 Hectares against 71.25 Hectares in Croatia as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Croatia and Resource-rich countries?
5,949 Hectares, with Resource-rich countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Resource-rich countries?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Croatia and Resource-rich countries rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Croatia ranks 21st and Resource-rich countries ranks 3rd of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Resource-rich countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/croatia-2/resource-rich-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/croatia-2/resource-rich-countries/">Croatia vs Resource-rich countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.