Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Cuba
64.1 Hectares
in 2020
Zimbabwe
65.65 Hectares
in 2020
Cuba rank
83rd
Zimbabwe rank
81st

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Cuba
  • Zimbabwe
0204060200020102020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 65.65 Hectares against 64.1 Hectares in Cuba, a difference of 1.55 Hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 83rd and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 175 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 51.84 Hectares 34.24 Hectares 17.6 Hectares Cuba
2010s 61.28 Hectares 47.08 Hectares 14.2 Hectares Cuba
2020s 64.1 Hectares 65.65 Hectares 1.55 Hectares Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 65.65 Hectares against 64.1 Hectares in Cuba as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
1.55 Hectares, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Cuba ranks 83rd and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability β€” Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/cuba/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/cuba/zimbabwe/">Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability β€” Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.