Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Iraq: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Democratic Republic of the Congo
199.75 Hectares
in 2020
Iraq
208.53 Hectares
in 2020
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
38th
Iraq rank
40th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Iraq
50100150200200020102020

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 208.53 Hectares against 199.75 Hectares in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 8.78 Hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 38th and Iraq ranks 40th of 47 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 1 and Iraq in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Iraq Difference Ahead
2000s 102.67 Hectares 92.06 Hectares 10.61 Hectares Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 153.29 Hectares 165.78 Hectares 12.49 Hectares Iraq
2020s 199.75 Hectares 208.53 Hectares 8.78 Hectares Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Iraq?
Iraq, at 208.53 Hectares against 199.75 Hectares in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Iraq?
8.78 Hectares, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Iraq?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Iraq rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 38th and Iraq ranks 40th of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Iraq: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/iraq/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/iraq/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Iraq: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.