East Africa (African Union) vs Poland: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

East Africa (African Union)
586.76 Hectares
in 2020
Poland
575.59 Hectares
in 2020
East Africa (African Union) rank
29th
Poland rank
30th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • East Africa (African Union)
  • Poland
0200400600200020102020

How they compare

East Africa (African Union) currently reports 586.76 Hectares against 575.59 Hectares in Poland, a difference of 11.17 Hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Poland ahead.

East Africa (African Union) ranks 29th and Poland ranks 30th of 47 regions.

Across the 3 decades both report, East Africa (African Union) averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Africa (African Union) Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 287.25 Hectares 500.91 Hectares 213.66 Hectares Poland
2010s 432.79 Hectares 570.67 Hectares 137.88 Hectares Poland
2020s 586.76 Hectares 575.59 Hectares 11.17 Hectares East Africa (African Union)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, East Africa (African Union) or Poland?
East Africa (African Union), at 586.76 Hectares against 575.59 Hectares in Poland as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between East Africa (African Union) and Poland?
11.17 Hectares, with East Africa (African Union) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Africa (African Union) and Poland?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do East Africa (African Union) and Poland rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
East Africa (African Union) ranks 29th and Poland ranks 30th of 47 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Africa (African Union) vs Poland: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/east-africa-african-union/poland-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/east-africa-african-union/poland-2/">East Africa (African Union) vs Poland: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.