East African Community vs Thailand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

East African Community
437.12 Hectares
in 2020
Thailand
331.6 Hectares
in 2020
East African Community rank
32nd
Thailand rank
25th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • East African Community
  • Thailand
100200300400200020102020

How they compare

East African Community currently reports 437.12 Hectares against 331.6 Hectares in Thailand, a difference of 105.52 Hectares.

That makes East African Community's figure about 1.3 times Thailand's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, East African Community has been ahead every year.

East African Community ranks 32nd and Thailand ranks 25th of 47 groups.

East African Community has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East African Community Thailand Difference Ahead
2000s 199.79 Hectares 150.69 Hectares 49.1 Hectares East African Community
2010s 324.63 Hectares 286.11 Hectares 38.51 Hectares East African Community
2020s 437.12 Hectares 331.6 Hectares 105.52 Hectares East African Community

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, East African Community or Thailand?
East African Community, at 437.12 Hectares against 331.6 Hectares in Thailand as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between East African Community and Thailand?
105.52 Hectares, with East African Community ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East African Community and Thailand?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do East African Community and Thailand rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
East African Community ranks 32nd and Thailand ranks 25th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East African Community vs Thailand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/east-african-community/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/east-african-community/thailand/">East African Community vs Thailand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.