Equatorial Guinea vs United Kingdom: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Equatorial Guinea
6.53 Hectares
in 2020
United Kingdom
995.65 Hectares
in 2020
Equatorial Guinea rank
25th
United Kingdom rank
13th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • United Kingdom
02004006008001.0k200020102020

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 995.65 Hectares against 6.53 Hectares in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 989.12 Hectares.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 152.5 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 25th and United Kingdom ranks 13th of 28 groups.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 2.48 Hectares 934.03 Hectares 931.55 Hectares United Kingdom
2010s 4.3 Hectares 991.07 Hectares 986.77 Hectares United Kingdom
2020s 6.53 Hectares 995.65 Hectares 989.12 Hectares United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Equatorial Guinea or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 995.65 Hectares against 6.53 Hectares in Equatorial Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Equatorial Guinea and United Kingdom?
989.12 Hectares, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and United Kingdom?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Equatorial Guinea and United Kingdom rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 25th and United Kingdom ranks 13th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs United Kingdom: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/equatorial-guinea-2/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/equatorial-guinea-2/united-kingdom/">Equatorial Guinea vs United Kingdom: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.