Georgia vs Zambia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Georgia
78.46 Hectares
in 2020
Zambia
83.1 Hectares
in 2020
Georgia rank
69th
Zambia rank
67th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Georgia
  • Zambia
020406080200020102020

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 83.1 Hectares against 78.46 Hectares in Georgia, a difference of 4.64 Hectares.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 69th and Zambia ranks 67th of 170 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 56.82 Hectares 38.9 Hectares 17.92 Hectares Georgia
2010s 74.26 Hectares 57.72 Hectares 16.54 Hectares Georgia
2020s 78.46 Hectares 83.1 Hectares 4.64 Hectares Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Georgia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 83.1 Hectares against 78.46 Hectares in Georgia as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Georgia and Zambia?
4.64 Hectares, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Zambia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Georgia and Zambia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Georgia ranks 69th and Zambia ranks 67th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Zambia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/georgia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/georgia/zambia/">Georgia vs Zambia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.