Grenada vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Grenada
0.622 Hectares
in 2020
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0.6162 Hectares
in 2020
Grenada rank
153rd
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
155th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Grenada
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
00.20.40.6200020102020

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 0.622 Hectares against 0.6162 Hectares in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.0058 Hectares.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.

Grenada ranks 153rd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 155th of 170 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
2000s 0.5754 Hectares 0.4173 Hectares 0.1581 Hectares Grenada
2010s 0.6185 Hectares 0.5644 Hectares 0.0541 Hectares Grenada
2020s 0.622 Hectares 0.6162 Hectares 0.0058 Hectares Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Grenada or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Grenada, at 0.622 Hectares against 0.6162 Hectares in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Grenada and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0.0058 Hectares, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Grenada and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Grenada ranks 153rd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 155th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/grenada/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/grenada/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Grenada vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.