How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Namibia?

21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.

Where does this data come from?

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Israel vs Namibia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Israel

80.44 Hectares

in 2020

Namibia

78.23 Hectares

in 2020

Israel rank

73rd

Namibia rank

75th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

Israel
Namibia

How they compare

Israel currently reports 80.44 Hectares against 78.23 Hectares in Namibia, a difference of 2.21 Hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.

Israel ranks 73rd and Namibia ranks 75th of 175 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Israel	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	47.08 Hectares	50.98 Hectares	3.91 Hectares	Namibia
2010s	68.35 Hectares	59.17 Hectares	9.18 Hectares	Israel
2020s	80.44 Hectares	78.23 Hectares	2.2 Hectares	Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Israel or Namibia?: Israel, at 80.44 Hectares against 78.23 Hectares in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Israel and Namibia?: 2.21 Hectares, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Namibia?: 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Israel and Namibia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?: Israel ranks 73rd and Namibia ranks 75th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Namibia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/israel/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/israel/namibia/">Israel vs Namibia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit: Hectares
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence: OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.