Kiribati vs Samoa: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Kiribati
0.0233 Hectares
in 2020
Samoa
0.0291 Hectares
in 2020
Kiribati rank
173rd
Samoa rank
172nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Kiribati
  • Samoa
00.010.020.03200020102020

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 0.0291 Hectares against 0.0233 Hectares in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0058 Hectares.

That makes Samoa's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 173rd and Samoa ranks 172nd of 175 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0233 Hectares 0.0291 Hectares 0.0058 Hectares Samoa
2010s 0.0233 Hectares 0.0291 Hectares 0.0058 Hectares Samoa
2020s 0.0233 Hectares 0.0291 Hectares 0.0058 Hectares Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Kiribati or Samoa?
Samoa, at 0.0291 Hectares against 0.0233 Hectares in Kiribati as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Kiribati and Samoa?
0.0058 Hectares, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Samoa?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Kiribati and Samoa rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Kiribati ranks 173rd and Samoa ranks 172nd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability β€” Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Samoa: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/kiribati/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/kiribati/samoa/">Kiribati vs Samoa: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability β€” Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.