Least developed countries vs United States: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Least developed countries
1,879 Hectares
in 2020
United States
10,913 Hectares
in 2020
Least developed countries rank
7th
United States rank
3rd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Least developed countries
  • United States
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k200020102020

How they compare

United States currently reports 10,913 Hectares against 1,879 Hectares in Least developed countries, a difference of 9,034 Hectares.

That makes United States's figure about 5.8 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 7th and United States ranks 3rd of 28 groups.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries United States Difference Ahead
2000s 932.85 Hectares 8,437 Hectares 7,504 Hectares United States
2010s 1,425 Hectares 10,279 Hectares 8,854 Hectares United States
2020s 1,879 Hectares 10,913 Hectares 9,034 Hectares United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Least developed countries or United States?
United States, at 10,913 Hectares against 1,879 Hectares in Least developed countries as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Least developed countries and United States?
9,034 Hectares, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and United States?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Least developed countries and United States rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Least developed countries ranks 7th and United States ranks 3rd of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs United States: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/least-developed-countries/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/least-developed-countries/united-states/">Least developed countries vs United States: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.