How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Tunisia?

21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.

Where does this data come from?

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Libya vs Tunisia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Libya

96.68 Hectares

in 2020

Tunisia

96.38 Hectares

in 2020

Libya rank

66th

Tunisia rank

67th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

Libya
Tunisia

How they compare

Libya currently reports 96.68 Hectares against 96.38 Hectares in Tunisia, a difference of 0.3 Hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tunisia ahead.

Libya ranks 66th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 175 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Libya	Tunisia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	58.08 Hectares	71 Hectares	12.92 Hectares	Tunisia
2010s	81.51 Hectares	85.62 Hectares	4.11 Hectares	Tunisia
2020s	96.68 Hectares	96.38 Hectares	0.2964 Hectares	Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Libya or Tunisia?: Libya, at 96.68 Hectares against 96.38 Hectares in Tunisia as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Libya and Tunisia?: 0.3 Hectares, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Tunisia?: 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Libya and Tunisia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?: Libya ranks 66th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Tunisia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/libya/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/libya/tunisia/">Libya vs Tunisia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit: Hectares
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence: OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.