Liechtenstein vs Sao Tome and Principe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Liechtenstein
0.7673 Hectares
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe
0.9998 Hectares
in 2020
Liechtenstein rank
152nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
149th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Liechtenstein
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0.20.40.60.81200020102020

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.9998 Hectares against 0.7673 Hectares in Liechtenstein, a difference of 0.2325 Hectares.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.3 times Liechtenstein's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Liechtenstein ranks 152nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 149th of 170 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liechtenstein Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 0.6127 Hectares 0.8254 Hectares 0.2127 Hectares Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.8138 Hectares 0.8847 Hectares 0.0709 Hectares Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.7673 Hectares 0.9998 Hectares 0.2325 Hectares Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Liechtenstein or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.9998 Hectares against 0.7673 Hectares in Liechtenstein as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Liechtenstein and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.2325 Hectares, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Sao Tome and Principe?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Liechtenstein and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Liechtenstein ranks 152nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 149th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liechtenstein vs Sao Tome and Principe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/liechtenstein/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/liechtenstein/sao-tome-and-principe/">Liechtenstein vs Sao Tome and Principe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.