How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Tonga?

21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.

Where does this data come from?

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Monaco vs Tonga: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Monaco

0.2034 Hectares

in 2020

Tonga

0.0698 Hectares

in 2020

Monaco rank

166th

Tonga rank

169th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

Monaco
Tonga

How they compare

Monaco currently reports 0.2034 Hectares against 0.0698 Hectares in Tonga, a difference of 0.1336 Hectares.

That makes Monaco's figure about 2.9 times Tonga's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tonga ahead.

Monaco ranks 166th and Tonga ranks 169th of 175 countries.

Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Monaco	Tonga	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.1691 Hectares	0.0698 Hectares	0.0993 Hectares	Monaco
2010s	0.2034 Hectares	0.0698 Hectares	0.1336 Hectares	Monaco
2020s	0.2034 Hectares	0.0698 Hectares	0.1336 Hectares	Monaco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Monaco or Tonga?: Monaco, at 0.2034 Hectares against 0.0698 Hectares in Tonga as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Monaco and Tonga?: 0.1336 Hectares, with Monaco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Tonga?: 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Monaco and Tonga rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?: Monaco ranks 166th and Tonga ranks 169th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Monaco vs Tonga: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/monaco/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/monaco/tonga/">Monaco vs Tonga: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit: Hectares
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence: OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. <br><br> Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.