Mongolia vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Mongolia
61.49 Hectares
in 2020
Zimbabwe
65.65 Hectares
in 2020
Mongolia rank
84th
Zimbabwe rank
81st

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Mongolia
  • Zimbabwe
0204060200020102020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 65.65 Hectares against 61.49 Hectares in Mongolia, a difference of 4.16 Hectares.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mongolia ahead.

Mongolia ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 175 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 43.31 Hectares 34.24 Hectares 9.08 Hectares Mongolia
2010s 48.57 Hectares 47.08 Hectares 1.49 Hectares Mongolia
2020s 61.49 Hectares 65.65 Hectares 4.16 Hectares Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Mongolia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 65.65 Hectares against 61.49 Hectares in Mongolia as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Mongolia and Zimbabwe?
4.16 Hectares, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Zimbabwe?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Mongolia and Zimbabwe rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Mongolia ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/mongolia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/mongolia/zimbabwe/">Mongolia vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. <br><br> Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.