Mozambique vs Turkmenistan: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Mozambique
70.74 Hectares
in 2020
Turkmenistan
67.84 Hectares
in 2020
Mozambique rank
73rd
Turkmenistan rank
74th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Mozambique
  • Turkmenistan
020406080200020102020

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 70.74 Hectares against 67.84 Hectares in Turkmenistan, a difference of 2.9 Hectares.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mozambique ahead.

Mozambique ranks 73rd and Turkmenistan ranks 74th of 170 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
2000s 36.2 Hectares 17.95 Hectares 18.25 Hectares Mozambique
2010s 51.24 Hectares 41.21 Hectares 10.03 Hectares Mozambique
2020s 70.74 Hectares 67.84 Hectares 2.9 Hectares Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Mozambique or Turkmenistan?
Mozambique, at 70.74 Hectares against 67.84 Hectares in Turkmenistan as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Mozambique and Turkmenistan?
2.9 Hectares, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Turkmenistan?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Mozambique and Turkmenistan rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Mozambique ranks 73rd and Turkmenistan ranks 74th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Turkmenistan: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/mozambique/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/mozambique/turkmenistan/">Mozambique vs Turkmenistan: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.