New Zealand vs Slovenia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

New Zealand
202.99 Hectares
in 2020
Slovenia
30.68 Hectares
in 2020
New Zealand rank
42nd
Slovenia rank
42nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • New Zealand
  • Slovenia
050100150200200020102020

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 202.99 Hectares against 30.68 Hectares in Slovenia, a difference of 172.31 Hectares.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 6.6 times Slovenia's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 42nd and Slovenia ranks 42nd of 170 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 194.46 Hectares 26.56 Hectares 167.9 Hectares New Zealand
2010s 201.07 Hectares 30.48 Hectares 170.59 Hectares New Zealand
2020s 202.99 Hectares 30.68 Hectares 172.31 Hectares New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, New Zealand or Slovenia?
New Zealand, at 202.99 Hectares against 30.68 Hectares in Slovenia as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between New Zealand and Slovenia?
172.31 Hectares, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Slovenia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do New Zealand and Slovenia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
New Zealand ranks 42nd and Slovenia ranks 42nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Slovenia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/new-zealand/slovenia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/new-zealand/slovenia-2/">New Zealand vs Slovenia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.