Rwanda vs Trinidad and Tobago: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Rwanda
13.52 Hectares
in 2020
Trinidad and Tobago
15.11 Hectares
in 2020
Rwanda rank
130th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
128th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Rwanda
  • Trinidad and Tobago
051015200020102020

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 15.11 Hectares against 13.52 Hectares in Rwanda, a difference of 1.59 Hectares.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 130th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 128th of 170 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2000s 5.34 Hectares 8.18 Hectares 2.84 Hectares Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 9.7 Hectares 14.22 Hectares 4.52 Hectares Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 13.52 Hectares 15.11 Hectares 1.59 Hectares Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Rwanda or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 15.11 Hectares against 13.52 Hectares in Rwanda as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Rwanda and Trinidad and Tobago?
1.59 Hectares, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Trinidad and Tobago?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Rwanda and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Rwanda ranks 130th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 128th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Trinidad and Tobago: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/rwanda/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/rwanda/trinidad-and-tobago/">Rwanda vs Trinidad and Tobago: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.