San Marino vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

San Marino
0.622 Hectares
in 2020
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.558 Hectares
in 2020
San Marino rank
153rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
156th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • San Marino
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.20.40.6200020102020

How they compare

San Marino currently reports 0.622 Hectares against 0.558 Hectares in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.064 Hectares.

That makes San Marino's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.

San Marino ranks 153rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 156th of 170 countries.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade San Marino Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 0.4929 Hectares 0.3296 Hectares 0.1633 Hectares San Marino
2010s 0.6185 Hectares 0.497 Hectares 0.1215 Hectares San Marino
2020s 0.622 Hectares 0.558 Hectares 0.064 Hectares San Marino

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, San Marino or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
San Marino, at 0.622 Hectares against 0.558 Hectares in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between San Marino and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.064 Hectares, with San Marino ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do San Marino and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
San Marino ranks 153rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 156th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

San Marino vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/san-marino/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/san-marino/st-kitts-and-nevis/">San Marino vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.