Slovenia vs Syrian Arab Republic: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Slovenia
30.68 Hectares
in 2020
Syrian Arab Republic
132.66 Hectares
in 2020
Slovenia rank
42nd
Syrian Arab Republic rank
40th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Slovenia
  • Syrian Arab Republic
255075100125200020102020

How they compare

Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 132.66 Hectares against 30.68 Hectares in Slovenia, a difference of 101.98 Hectares.

That makes Syrian Arab Republic's figure about 4.3 times Slovenia's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Syrian Arab Republic has been ahead every year.

Slovenia ranks 42nd and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 40th of 47 countries.

Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 26.56 Hectares 85.02 Hectares 58.46 Hectares Syrian Arab Republic
2010s 30.48 Hectares 113.78 Hectares 83.3 Hectares Syrian Arab Republic
2020s 30.68 Hectares 132.66 Hectares 101.98 Hectares Syrian Arab Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Slovenia or Syrian Arab Republic?
Syrian Arab Republic, at 132.66 Hectares against 30.68 Hectares in Slovenia as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Slovenia and Syrian Arab Republic?
101.98 Hectares, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Syrian Arab Republic?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Slovenia and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Slovenia ranks 42nd and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 40th of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovenia vs Syrian Arab Republic: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/slovenia-2/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://urban.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-artificial-surfaces/slovenia-2/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Slovenia vs Syrian Arab Republic: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.